Legislating minimum wages and benefits for this segment is lazy policymaking and can end up having a regressive impact due to weak oversight capacity. The "lal battis" (red beacons) have gone, and it’s time now to puncture some sarkari egos further and spread the accolades for social and economic achievements. Both Indian companies and the government routinely advertise for engineers even when an experienced mechanic is needed.So how can the government help create new jobs and preserve existing ones? Kickstarting infrastructure projects; promoting "Make in India" and resolving the bad loans burden of banks — are all great government initiatives for new employment. Individual employers, with a track record of employing more than five workers and banking wages of more than Rs 10 lakhs per year, should be publicly recognised as "social growth enablers".

The government can step in with near-time transactional measures for light-handed regulation of such employment.Third, introduce disincentives for layoffs. Only when we consciously make the paper chase redundant will we value real-life skills accretion, where the maximum potential for human jobs exists. Instead, the government should promote the payment of wages into bank accounts to generate big data on such employment..First, extend the H1-B strategy, used to great advantage in the US, for temporarily exporting Indian workers overseas. But companies can be incentivised to be socially responsible employers. This unfortunate social milieu engenders "qualification creep". Technology is fast eroding the capacity gap between the unique attributes of human labour and machines.Ask any of the 68 government departments in New Delhi what they are doing about private sector jobs, and each will point at the other for an answer.Last, the optics must be right.But does the private sector have incentives to produce jobs.Second, build respect for skilled work by venerating those who have these skills. The government needs to step away from the colonial pedestal of being the "mai baap" (supreme preserver). Rich countries, with ageing populations who need the workers, but fear the cultural dilution associated with permanent immigration would be the targets. Yes, flexibility in workforce management is a must for employers. Instead, there is a stigma attached to it, as being fit only for those who cannot afford the high cost and long incubation period for becoming a doctor. Why is a Bachelor of Ars degree needed to become a bank clerk — a high responsibility but a routine, people skills-oriented job? Only a select few, intending to teach at the college level or do research, should need a master’s degree. Good nursing vastly reduces the workload for doctors — specially in the emergency room for the care of trauma patients. But their impact is medium term. But this noble, highly skilled profession is not a first choice today.

The truth is that governments have not been held accountable for job creation since the 1980s, when neo-liberalism took root. Looking purely at the bottomline, machines are superior to humans. Tests and interviews for jobs should focus on personality and psychological attributes, rather than educational qualifications, which are rarely aligned with job skills anyway. Around 300 million workers are employed in the agrarian and household sector as daily wagers or long-term help by individuals — farmers, rich and middle class urban households.Fourth, the Niti Aayog has taken the lead to plug the data gap on jobs in the informal sector, that will generate most of the incremental employment. No one advocates going down the horribly inefficient public sector job creation route again. So it is up to the private sector and self-employment to absorb our surging army of millennials — almost 10 million strong annually — which is equal to the entire Australian workforce. Consider the irrational gap between the wage for a nurse versus a doctor. The associated fiscal costs are outweighed by the social and economic benefits from repatriated earnings alone. Those who go beyond watching their "bottomline" to retaining and growing their employees should be rewarded through tax breaks, access to cheaper finance and publicly recognised as nation builders. Bots will progressively replace humans, more so in logically-executed routine jobs. Why not devise an index to assess social leadership qualities of company honchos before they get awards and honours, get invited to Rashtrapati Bhavan; preferential access to our ambassadors overseas or get nominated on to government committees? We need to publicly distinguish between narrow-minded private employers who only watch bottomlines, and truly transformative business leaders, if the private sector is to lead in job creation. Siri (Apple), Cortana (Microsoft), Google Now and the mellifluously named Maluuba are all cheaper than hiring a real-life assistant and are on call 24x7. Here are four options.

A stretch target could be to export a million workers over the next three years. If costs are shared between the bank and the government, a budget outlay of Rs 5,000 crores can pay for this incentive and China Stereo Adapters for sale bank annual wage payments of an estimated Rs 18 trillion, much of which is in cash today. They also come with financial incentives for capital investment — cheap bank finance and accelerated depreciation for tax purposes — which boost the bottomline. In the near-term, the government needs to preserve existing jobs. Not only are human services more expensive, but they come with enormous social and economic costs for housing, transport, education, health and security. Assign targets to our ambassadors posted in these locations to negotiate with their host countries to allow temporary immigration, lightly monitored by the government and directly supported, under the Skills India initiative, to acquire local language and cultural skills. An incentive of Rs 5 credited back to the employer’s account for every Rs 1,000 paid into an employee account could help. Our caste and hierarchy-ridden Brahmanical social norms devalue skills and overvalue "intellect" — both in the public and private sectors.

Hide Comments | Add Comment